<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BoM 8: First Book of Nephi, Chapters 2-4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecriticaledition.net/chapter-71/first-book-nephi-chapters-2-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecriticaledition.net/chapter-71/first-book-nephi-chapters-2-4</link>
	<description>Life, annotated</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G. Scott</title>
		<link>http://thecriticaledition.net/chapter-71/first-book-nephi-chapters-2-4/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecriticaledition.net/?p=71#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment.

It's fairly easy to read a text and imitate its style. As for his third grade education, I would wager that a third grade education in Smith's time would produce a much better reader (and writer) than a third grade education in our day. Reading and writing were the only subjects in school, and they would have gotten much more coverage than they do today. Lastly, the Bible's stories and language was much more a part of the society of Smith's day than ours. Biblical language and stories would have been learned similarly to talking: seemingly absorbed, not purposely taught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fairly easy to read a text and imitate its style. As for his third grade education, I would wager that a third grade education in Smith&#8217;s time would produce a much better reader (and writer) than a third grade education in our day. Reading and writing were the only subjects in school, and they would have gotten much more coverage than they do today. Lastly, the Bible&#8217;s stories and language was much more a part of the society of Smith&#8217;s day than ours. Biblical language and stories would have been learned similarly to talking: seemingly absorbed, not purposely taught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Cox</title>
		<link>http://thecriticaledition.net/chapter-71/first-book-nephi-chapters-2-4/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecriticaledition.net/?p=71#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Smith had no more than a third grade education.  Yet you claim he patterned his book after the Old Testament?  Could you have done that with a third grade education?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smith had no more than a third grade education.  Yet you claim he patterned his book after the Old Testament?  Could you have done that with a third grade education?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
